Wednesday, September 16, 2015

"Would you like to play a game?" Solution

This is Jason again.

As the title suggests this one started with a simple question, and an image of a bunch of cards and question marks:
All the cards that can be seen are players. Where a card is missing it’s replaced with one, two, or three question marks. Seemed plausible that this was telling me the number of digits in the card that was missing. Interestingly the number of cards per row appeared to be four for most rows, three for the first three rows and five for one row, so.. inconsistent and so far not helpful.

A few more things were said about this one at the beginning:


The CM saying “box score” really sent me the wrong direction for the first couple of days on this one. Especially when I saw that there were nine rows, and at least three cards per row. I thought maybe this somehow represented nine innings for a team in a particular game in history… which of course was not even close.

Just like the other card points I spent awhile at the beginning bulding a spreadsheet with all of the card numbers, names and other information. Part of this process involved looking at the backs and scouring for anything interesting. That reminded me that “games played” was a stat, and I figured that would be key, but I wasn’t sure how quite yet.

So I stared and stared at my spreadsheet with no revelations, and then a tweet arrived shortly after midnight (for me). I think this is the infamous one AM tweet :)
I was about to fall asleep when my phone buzzed telling me that tweet was posted. I read it, and nothing clicked immediately. I got out of bed, opened my spreadsheet and stared some more particularly at the first three rows, but after a few minutes I chose sleeping over insanity.

The next morning I woke up and somehow my brain figured out the biggest leap in my sleep as I sat up and exclaimed to myself, “It’s a sudoku!”. At that moment I had not really mapped out how solving it worked, but I knew that’s what was happening - I think it was all of the talk of nine.

Back to the hints:
Top three? The whole nine yards.
Bottom six? Two out of three ain’t bad. 

In a sudoku there are three criteria to fulfill:

  1. Each row has 1-9 
  2. Each column has 1-9 
  3. Within each box of the sudoku you then have 1-9 as well 
Criteria three is what the CM referred to when he said the “box score” only existed for the top three. The fact that it only exists for the top three is why two out of three ain't bad for the bottom six (rows and columns).

Let’s look at a bit of what was going on, with each number representing the games played on the back of the pictured cards.

first cards of the first three rows:
918
257
463

middle cards of the first three rows:
356
???
278

third cards of first three rows:
274
368
159

putting it all together you get:
918 356 274
257 ??? 368
463 278 159

Using the three criteria we determine that the missing ??? are 194, and that then fulfills the “whole nine yards” for the top three.

We'll skip the process of solving the sudoku, but the gist is that each question mark represents 1 digit in the sudoku grid. Cracking it required finding the missing digit that goes with each question mark.

After cracking the sudoku we have these numbers:
194
5
734
38
26
78
582

At this point Adam and I had a chat debate about whether these were card numbers or if these were “games played” on the back of cards. The main selling point of the card number argument is that it would be easy. After a bit we decided it was definitely the “games played” statistic, and then started to look through every card in the set to find them all… ugh. This was a bit of a painful process, but we were able to identify a card that worked for all of them (almost). There is no card that matches 582, and after some more debate we decided that the intention must be to use 5 (again) and then 82. The fact that Schoop showed up twice in the original image was interpreted by us as a bit of a hint that this was the right decision, so we went with it.

We assembled an image, tweeted it:
And then Adam made this amazing post to celebrate and as a bit of a shout out to Steve who really wanted the answer to be #stanleycupfinals:
:)

Thursday, August 6, 2015

“9 card shuffle” solution

This is Jason. On January 13, 2015 the CM dropped a new card related point:

I saw two things right away: all the cards are baseball players, and one of 9 in each group is a landscape orientation. Bonus observation: the landscape cards are both pitchers. This led me to some ideas of what might be going on, and my general goal was produce the same number from each grid to represent the new card.

 After some unsuccessful guesses the CM reset the clock and provided a hint:
I wasn’t quite sure what this was supposed to mean. I noticed that the rectangles were the same orientations as the cards in the first row of the other grid. I thought I figured it out a few times with various additions of characteristics of the cards, but a few resets later another grid was sent out:
So now we have three grids and the new one is “special” somehow. Earlier on in the point I collected a bunch of info in a spreadsheet such as last name, first name, card number, length of last name, etc. but nothing was really working out. I switched to just focus on how the new grid was different. After staring at it for awhile I noticed something and it turned out to be the key. Check out the last names in each row of the initial grids, and then check out the last names in each row of the “special” one. Do you see it?

In the special grid the last names of the players within a row are in ascending alphabetical order. This is one of the keys and it’s where my name for the point comes from… 9 card shuffle.

I went back to the original grids and ordered each row by last name and then had a cell with the card number next to it. I’ll walk through the one with Maddux in the first row since that’s the one that the CM hinted about.

Maddux 127 | Simmons 172 | Vizquel 67
Fisk 158 | Teheran 229 | Trout 101
Cingrani 240 | Snider 261 | Strasburg 333

I realized that the hint was saying to take the 9 cards in the grid and produce 3 NEW cards and from those produce 1 NEW card. I looked at what I created and in my spreadsheet I actually had something that looked more like this:

Maddux 127
Simmons 172
Vizquel 67

 I took a leap that each card number would produce one of the digits of the card number and since the sort order was relevant I thought that it might be first card = digit one, second card = digit two, third card = digit three. Do this for each row and you get:

177 - Anthony Rizzo
121 - Freddie Freeman
263 - Alfonso Soriano

I knew I was on to something when I checked out the images of these cards. Rizzo and Freeman are portrait, while Soriano is landscape like in the hint.

Adam happened to sign on, the clock was ticking down and I told him where I was at. I had not made the next logical leap yet, and was not sure yet how to get to a single card from here. Adam suggested I just do the same thing again with these cards. Sort and then pull the digits:

Freeman - 121
Rizzo - 177
Soriano - 263

This produces card 173 - Jose Fernandez

The three cards from the other grid in order are:
Bautista - 185
Holliday - 170
Lester - 103

As you can see you get 173 again, so it’s confirmed that this is right. Point scored just before the clock reset - pretty fun one.

Monday, August 3, 2015

Enter Properly

This is Jason again. Grant’s right.. typing the solutions up are almost as challenging as the code itself! On November 14 the CM launched this one with this tweet:
At first I didn’t see it and was focused on the “heard it in song” part which took me to the Larger than Life inserts - Paul Bunyan, Johnny Appleseed, Davy Crockett, and Pocahontas came to mind due to their respective songs. The style of the tweet also had me thinking that this was a return to the profile style point. “His” knocks out Pocahontas and “Trying to pass, his line ended here” knocked out the rest of the candidates so I started doing some research on the other cards in this set and found Casey Jones.

I learned that his full name is “Jonathan Luther Jones” - hm.. this seemed to match up well with “Enter Properly”. He died in a train accident (“line ended here”) while traveling toward Vaughan, Mississippi which seemed to solidify that this was definitely the “who” on this one. The door wasn’t obvious yet even though it had already been said. I went back to the original tweet and then read it aloud - “Heard it in song or read it…” ah-ha. Reddit!

That realization led here:
http://www.reddit.com/user/jonathanlutherjones

Like some of the other profiles nothing about it makes it obvious it’s correct. Now to figure out the password… I had already “entered properly” to get to the profile so the only unused part of the tweet seemed like it had to be the password - “his line ended here”. I wasn’t getting in, and it sounds like ParanoidAndrew was also puzzled at the same spot. Keep in mind other active points were happening at the same time, so I think that took it’s toll a bit.

It was on the 18th that this tweet came and proved to be essential:
Ok.. so we have the proper name for Mark Twain and details about his birth and death - similar to what you might see on a headstone. I processed this a bit and considered if I had to find the text on the actual Casey Jones headstone, but abandoned that pretty quickly. I went back to my idea that “his line ended here” pointed to the password and applied the formatting hinted at in the Twain tweet. With a password of “VaughanMS” the Reddit account opened, and my heart started racing.

I figured Andrew had to be really close and I was frantically trying to find the text telling me what I had to do. I’m forgetting exactly where the message was, but it said to:
Change the password on the account.
Change nothing else. Doing so forfeits the point for all.
Tweet the famous last words of Casey Jones at the CM with hashtag CaseyJones.
When prompted, provide the password.

 As someone that had never been in a Reddit account I was now frantically trying to find the option to change the password. I found it, changed it and then just sat for about 10 minutes catching my breath. After a double and triple check I posted this:
To this the CM replied “And?” and I replied “bosunknows”, the new account password. Point Bosun!

Wednesday, July 29, 2015

"10 Types of People Point" Solution









********************************************************









********************************************************

And now, we give the solution to my favorite point of the contest. :)

The way the initial tweets were released (long strings of numbers, followed by "that's too mean", and then immediately followed by block versions of the strings), we felt pretty strongly that the CM released the point exactly as he intended. By showing the first step in the process, he confirmed that the lines in each block were important.

We did the math, and recognized that each line in each block contained exactly 8 card numbers. We knew the next step would be to identify the individual card numbers in each line, but that was impossible to do uniquely without more information (e.g. "2832246" could be "283 22 46", or "28 322 46", or "28 32 246" ... you get the picture).

The CM did indeed take pity on us on the following Tuesday:




Now we had the information we needed, to identify the exact card numbers in each line.


201
55
225
61
293
87
183
39
186
127
178
151
51
255
13
247
253
187
250
93
50
57
309
345
223
59
26
272
44
226
77
84
247
34
140
343
260
56
339
281
305
193
349
207
325
346
148
9
72
340
20
321
231
194
20
8
244
7
311
278
202
137
256
149
42
134
108
149
126
54
94
16
37
136
237
138
301
10
169
279
77
101
58
105
281
139
42
170
331
245
31
146
182
344
149
126
111
106
38
218
229
285
260
157
261
142
144
78
220
298
261
1
1
306
258
14
129
338
116
120
25
135
299
312
113
171
319
40
316
184
132
83
173
268
117
280
94
66
109
185
65
200
286
57
234
69
192
96
295
208
301
13
116
328
189
313
320
334
72
249
148
198
233
236
304
235
195
179
169
212
300
240
292
221
220
298
28
32
246
170
91
80
31
129
209
29
103
345
263
242
14
110




For a while, the fact that there are duplicates (and trips) in the grid bothered us.  However, moving forward, we did a quick lookup from the 2014 Ginter base checklist to find the subjects of all those card numbers, and got:


Paul O’NeillAndrew LamboPedro MartinezBo JacksonManny RamirezAlex GordonJim PalmerChris Sale
Billy HamiltonGreg MadduxDomonic BrownJames PaxtonOswaldo ArciaAndre RienzoGary SheffieldBilly Williams
Rickey HendersonDavid PriceSteve CishekWillie MaysOrlando HernandezCarlos BeltranHunter PenceYasiel Puig
Tony GwynnHal NewhouserFergie JenkinsTim RainesTy CobbBob GibsonStan MusialFrancisco Liriano
Billy WilliamsFelix HernandezMatt MoorePhil NiekroJay BruceJason HeywardJeff SamardzijaYoenis Cespedes
Jayson WerthTom GlavineJohn SmoltzJustin UptonDarryl StrawberryIvan NovaBryce HarperKoji Uehara
Ralph KinerDennis EckersleyBabe RuthAdam JonesCarlos GomezAvisail GarciaBabe RuthBob Feller
Jake MarisnickHector SantiagoAnibal SanchezCC SabathiaJim RiceReggie JacksonJuan MarichalJose Canseco
Junior LakeJordan ZimmermannNolan RyanJose CansecoWillie StargellYordano VenturaLou BrockBartolo Colon
Wil MyersCarlos GonzalezJames ShieldsMariano RiveraMatt KempAndrew McCutchenDale MurphySteve Carlton
Stan MusialMike TroutTyler SkaggsCole HamelsYoenis CespedesJacoby EllsburyJunior LakeMatt Holliday
Curtis GrandersonMatt HarveyMichael ChoiceMax ScherzerStarling MarteJason GrilliJose CansecoWillie Stargell
Frank RobinsonPatrick CorbinDon SuttonCasey KellyJulio TeheranCarl CrawfordJay BruceHisashi Iwakuma
Duke SniderHiroki KurodaBrett OberholtzerZack GreinkeJosh HamiltonDeion SandersDuke SniderRoger Maris
Roger MarisHyun-Jin RyuRicky NolascoMichael CuddyerHank AaronAndy PettitteBrett GardnerTom Seaver
Joe DiMaggioGrant BalfourEnny RomeroMike MussinaShin-Soo ChooDusty BakerSonny GraySteve Delabar
Ken Griffey Jr.Gerrit ColeTed WilliamsGiancarlo StantonJose FernandezJarrod ParkerYu DarvishWhitey Ford
Lou BrockRoger ClemensJhoulys ChacinJose BautistaFred McGriffZack WheelerKris MedlenCarlos Beltran
Roberto ClementeJohnny CuetoDaniel NavaMadison BumgarnerRyan BraunAl KalineMatt KempGary Sheffield
Brett GardnerC.J. WilsonClayton KershawJuan GonzalezChristian YelichErik JohnsonRalph KinerAroldis Chapman
Bryce HarperJeff LockeDan StrailyJ.D. MartinezMatt CainMasahiro TanakaChris CarpenterChris Archer
Dale MurphyDoug FisterR.A. DickeyTony CingraniAndre DawsonAdam EatonJosh HamiltonDeion Sanders
Mark TrumboTim LincecumDwight GoodenMatt HollidayClay BuchholzJustin VerlanderMichael ChoiceHank Aaron
Vladimir GuerreroShelby MillerJon LesterYasiel PuigAlfonso SorianoWarren SpahnMichael CuddyerJeremy Hellickson




Asking yourself the right questions is nearly always the key to finding the solution.  Brian and I noted that these were all baseball subjects.  So, over 150 unique card numbers from the 2014 set, and not a single non-baseball subject?  The odds of that being coincidence were infinitesimal, but we still didn't really have a definite path forward.  How could we bin things, or create some delineation?  American League vs National League?  Maybe, but that's somewhat ill-defined and tricky.  That's when I noticed something interesting about the first column of the table:  They are all hitters.  Hitters vs pitchers?  Maybe ...


Paul O’NeillAndrew LamboPedro MartinezBo JacksonManny RamirezAlex GordonJim PalmerChris Sale
Billy HamiltonGreg MadduxDomonic BrownJames PaxtonOswaldo ArciaAndre RienzoGary SheffieldBilly Williams
Rickey HendersonDavid PriceSteve CishekWillie MaysOrlando HernandezCarlos BeltranHunter PenceYasiel Puig
Tony GwynnHal NewhouserFergie JenkinsTim RainesTy CobbBob GibsonStan MusialFrancisco Liriano
Billy WilliamsFelix HernandezMatt MoorePhil NiekroJay BruceJason HeywardJeff SamardzijaYoenis Cespedes
Jayson WerthTom GlavineJohn SmoltzJustin UptonDarryl StrawberryIvan NovaBryce HarperKoji Uehara
Ralph KinerDennis EckersleyBabe RuthAdam JonesCarlos GomezAvisail GarciaBabe RuthBob Feller
Jake MarisnickHector SantiagoAnibal SanchezCC SabathiaJim RiceReggie JacksonJuan MarichalJose Canseco
Junior LakeJordan ZimmermannNolan RyanJose CansecoWillie StargellYordano VenturaLou BrockBartolo Colon
Wil MyersCarlos GonzalezJames ShieldsMariano RiveraMatt KempAndrew McCutchenDale MurphySteve Carlton
Stan MusialMike TroutTyler SkaggsCole HamelsYoenis CespedesJacoby EllsburyJunior LakeMatt Holliday
Curtis GrandersonMatt HarveyMichael ChoiceMax ScherzerStarling MarteJason GrilliJose CansecoWillie Stargell
Frank RobinsonPatrick CorbinDon SuttonCasey KellyJulio TeheranCarl CrawfordJay BruceHisashi Iwakuma
Duke SniderHiroki KurodaBrett OberholtzerZack GreinkeJosh HamiltonDeion SandersDuke SniderRoger Maris
Roger MarisHyun-Jin RyuRicky NolascoMichael CuddyerHank AaronAndy PettitteBrett GardnerTom Seaver
Joe DiMaggioGrant BalfourEnny RomeroMike MussinaShin-Soo ChooDusty BakerSonny GraySteve Delabar
Ken Griffey Jr.Gerrit ColeTed WilliamsGiancarlo StantonJose FernandezJarrod ParkerYu DarvishWhitey Ford
Lou BrockRoger ClemensJhoulys ChacinJose BautistaFred McGriffZack WheelerKris MedlenCarlos Beltran
Roberto ClementeJohnny CuetoDaniel NavaMadison BumgarnerRyan BraunAl KalineMatt KempGary Sheffield
Brett GardnerC.J. WilsonClayton KershawJuan GonzalezChristian YelichErik JohnsonRalph KinerAroldis Chapman
Bryce HarperJeff LockeDan StrailyJ.D. MartinezMatt CainMasahiro TanakaChris CarpenterChris Archer
Dale MurphyDoug FisterR.A. DickeyTony CingraniAndre DawsonAdam EatonJosh HamiltonDeion Sanders
Mark TrumboTim LincecumDwight GoodenMatt HollidayClay BuchholzJustin VerlanderMichael ChoiceHank Aaron
Vladimir GuerreroShelby MillerJon LesterYasiel PuigAlfonso SorianoWarren SpahnMichael CuddyerJeremy Hellickson




Brian and I had a running joke with Jim at this point in the contest.  We were like 20 points into this thing, and on at least a half-dozen separate occasions, Jim had declared "IT'S BINARY!!!".  So of course, when he proclaimed "IT'S BINARY!!!" this time, I basically said "I'm out".  :)   Little did we know, Jim was about to shine like a supernova ... and in less than 30 minutes, the point would be solved.


I won't post the chat history for this one, under the 2014 Ginter Code Trade Secrets and Proprietary Information (and Otherwise Embarrassing Evidence) Act of 2014, but at one point Jim said "It's binary, 100% ... or I'm 100% wrong, I have no perspective"; I said "This seems to be going nowhere ...", and Brian said "Is it in German?"  LOL.  Full credit for the remainder of this solution goes to Jim.  He obliterated it.


Pitchers and hitters.  Pitchers are 1's, and hitters are 0's.


0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1


Each line of the grid then becomes an 8-bit binary number.


0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
00100011
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
01010100
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
01101000
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
01100101
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
01110010
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
01100101
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
01000001
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
01110010
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
01100101
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
00110001
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
00110000
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
01010100
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
01111001
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
01110000
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
01100101
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
01110011
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
01001111
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
01100110
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
01010000
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
01100101
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
01101111
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
01110000
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
01101100
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
01100101


Then, each binary number is converted to its decimal value.


0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
00100011
35
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
01010100
84
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
01101000
104
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
01100101
101
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
01110010
114
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
01100101
101
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
01000001
65
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
01110010
114
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
01100101
101
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
00110001
49
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
00110000
48
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
01010100
84
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
01111001
121
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
01110000
112
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
01100101
101
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
01110011
115
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
01001111
79
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
01100110
102
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
01010000
80
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
01100101
101
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
01101111
111
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
01110000
112
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
01101100
108
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
01100101
101


And THEN, in a stunning twist ... each decimal value is converted to its ASCII equivalent.


0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
00100011
35
#
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
01010100
84
T
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
01101000
104
h
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
01100101
101
e
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
01110010
114
r
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
01100101
101
e
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
01000001
65
A
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
01110010
114
r
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
01100101
101
e
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
00110001
49
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
00110000
48
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
01010100
84
T
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
01111001
121
y
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
01110000
112
p
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
01100101
101
e
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
01110011
115
s
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
01001111
79
O
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
01100110
102
f
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
01010000
80
P
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
01100101
101
e
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
01101111
111
o
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
01110000
112
p
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
01101100
108
l
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
01100101
101
e


There are 10 types of people.  (Those who understand binary, and those who don't.)  A binary joke.  :)